The last developer milestone ( DEV300m60) of OpenOffice.org has been released. The next version of OpenOffice.org 3.2 has more than 42 features and 167 enhancements . The final version is expected to be available at the end of November 2009.Open Office 3.2


Many companies have contributed to this version like RedHat , RedFlag and IBM, making OpenOffice more stable and useful. I couldn't stop myself from seeing new features and enjoying them. So I downloaded DEV300m60 version. After playing with it for many days I could say that OpenOffice developers have done very good work in it. Well done !
I will review in this post some interesting features : more secure , faster , easier and more international.

more secure

Detect if non-encrypted streams are in encrypted document:

OOo expects that an encrypted document does not contain any non-encrypted streams starting from ODF1.2 version. The exceptions are the streams that are part of the ODF format: "mimetype", "META-INF/manifest.xml" and signature streams that follow the pattern "META-INF/*signatures*".

The manifest.xml is part of the document signature now:

In OpenOffice.org 3.2, the manifest.xml will be signed . This will introduce the limitation that macro signatures can't be introduced after the document was signed, because this would need manipulation of the (then) signed manifest.xml.

ODF document integrity check:

The document integrity check proves now whether the ODF document conforms the ODF specification. It mainly affects the ODF1.2 documents. If an inconsistency is found, the document is treated as a broken one, the office suggests to repair the document in this case. The macros are disabled in repaired documents.

Faster

Many issues have been fixed in order to make OpenOffice.org faster. The happy news that OpenOffice.org 3.2 is now faster than before in many aspects. The startup now 30% faster in Windows. Many issues have been ironed out in Writer (6 issues) and Calc (10 issues) regarding loading and saving times.

Now I can see that OpenOffice is faster than before but still there are many things have to be done in speed side.

Easier

    Default button in password dialog now is "OK" :Default button in password dialog

Although it is a small change but it makes OpenOffice more usable . Now The OK button in the password dialog is the default button again .

Remove the password length limitation:

password length limitation“ The current minimal password length limitation ( 5 characters ) is outdated and makes no sense any more. Thus the limitation is removed, although the password is not allowed to be empty. “

Import of password protected Microsoft Office XML documents:

This is a great feature. Many people asked me how we can open password protected docx/xlsx files. All document types are supported including: MS Word 2007 documents (*.docx, *.docm) - MS Word 2007 templates (*.dotx, *.dotm) - MS Excel 2007 documents (*.xlsx, *.xlsm) - MS Excel 2007 binary documents (*.xlsb) - MS Excel 2007 templates (*.xltx, *.xltm) - MS Powerpoint 2007 documents (*.pptx, *.pptm) - MS Powerpoint 2007 templates (*.potx, *.potm).

Encryption support for "Microsoft Word 97/2000/XP" :

This new feature make saving password protected Microsoft Word document possible with Microsoft Office standard RC4 algorithm.

Keyboard shortcut configuration dialog now supports "ALT" modifier:

supports ALT modifierBefore OpenOffice.org 3.2, the dialog for configuring keyboard shortcuts never allowed to use the ALT-key. Now ALT as well as SHIFT-ALT, CTRL-ALT and SHIFT-CTRL-ALT modifiers can be used in the dialog.

Impress and Draw now support comments:

To support collaboration, it is now possible to add comments to a presentation or drawing

document (using menu insert/comment or with the new Comments toolbar).comments in draw and impress

This feature was previously called "Notes" in writer and calc . It has been renamed to "Comments" in all applications to avoid a clash with the speaker notes feature in impress. This is also a consistent naming with other office suites.

MediaWiki filter is no more installed as part of OOo installation:

The MediaWiki filter is not installed as part of OOo installation any more. Instead it will be installed as a part of Wiki Publisher extension, since the two implementations are used together and it allows to provide updates for the filter independently from OOo releases.

Default paper sizes:

This is also a cool feature. In my country the default PaperSize is A4 not letter. Many time I forgot to change the page size and it causes me thinking why my documents show different from others documents.

Now OpenOffice.org 3.2 take the default PaperSize from Language local configuration. The default PaperSize for all countries will be like this:

  • US (United States) -> Letter
  • CA (Canada) -> Letter
  • PR (Puerto Rico, United States Territory) -> Letter
  • PH (Philippines) -> Letter
  • VE (Venezuela) -> Letter
  • CL (Chile) -> Letter
  • Mexico (MX) -> Letter
  • Colombia (CO) -> Letter
  • All Others -> A4

Menu items display changed :

Menu ItemThe display of menu items with checkmarks and item images changed slightly. Item images and checkmarks now are displayed in the same column. In case an item is both checkable and has an image, the image is displayed, but additionally the checked state is displayed in the same way checked toolbar buttons are displayed.

Option item "Icons in menus" now listbox with three options:

Icon in MenuThe Tools/Options->OpenOffice.org/View page now has a listbox for the "Icons in menus" option. This was a checkbox before and is now a listbox offering three options: 1) Automatic 2) Hide 3) Show.

Improved file locking:

in useNow if the file is used, you can open a copy from it or Open it in read mode only .

 

More integration with Windows 7 & KDE 4

 The new version OpenOffice.org 3.2 will use the native file picker dialog in Windows 7 and KDE 4.Windows 7 file pickersuppot KDE 4

More international

Graphite Font Support :

I am impressed with this feature. It helps OpenOffice.org to be more Open to minority languages like Malayalam language and Tamil language. To get more information about minority languages see this page.

Graphite Font SupportGraphite fonts are truetype fonts with extra tables which contain information for complex rendering such as context specific reordering, shaping and positioning. Unlike OpenType, the rendering engine does not need any prior knowledge of the script, the rendering rules are all contained in the font itself.  This makes it ideal for scripts and languages which are not directly supported in Uniscribe or ICU. Graphite also supports font features which allow variations in rendering to be selected according to linguistic or personal preference. To get free graphite fonts see here. 

Support for PS-OpenType fonts :

Another cool thing in OpenOffice.org 3.2 is supporting PS-OpenType fonts. Postscript based OpenType fonts are now supported (for formatting, printing, PDF-export and display).

In Addition, UNX platforms is now supported.

New Locale support:

OpenOffice.org 3.2 adds locale data for Asturian_Spain [ast-ES] , Yiddish_Israel [yi-IL], Arabic (Oman) [ar-OM] , Sardinian_Italy [sc-IT] , Quechua (Ecuador) [qu-EC] ,Oromo_Ethiopia [om-ET] , yghur_China [ug-CN], Ancient Greek [grc-GR], Somali_Somalia [so-SO] , Sorbian, Lower [dsb-DE] and Upper [hsb-DE] .

What's about Calc , chart and base ?

In next post I will take about them one by one. So stay tuned for next part . Comments are more than welcome.

Update: part 2 is ready check it here.

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

good post thanks for

Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 12/07/2009 - 13:00

good post
thanks for sharing

check grammar software

check grammar software (not verified) on Sat, 11/21/2009 - 17:50

Hey, check out these grammar software

Regards

Our teachers need to preview file before opening

Tom (not verified) on Wed, 11/18/2009 - 06:28

I really like Open Office Writer, but our teachers need a PREVIEW file feature under the Open command, as in MS Word, so they can see what's in the file. Is there any chance Open Office will add this feature soon?

org charting

nettroll (not verified) on Wed, 11/11/2009 - 18:11

Is there bundled tool for organizational charting? Like OrgPlus

No ribbon, ever!

zaine_ridling (not verified) on Sun, 11/01/2009 - 21:00

I will stick with OpenOffice as long as they never implement a ribbon-type interface. Better would be the tabbed style of Lotus Symphony, which is quite efficient for saving screen space.

Bibliography

Raymond (not verified) on Fri, 10/23/2009 - 19:23

Also, it would nice if I could create a bibliography without causing Openoffice to freeze.

Try Zotero! It's great and

Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/26/2009 - 13:37

Try Zotero! It's great and interacts quite well with OpenOffice through an additional plugin. Alternatively, you can use the RTF-scan feature in order to format your references (the latter is only available in Zotero 2.0 which is still beta).

WTF?

6205 (not verified) on Fri, 10/23/2009 - 15:30

And how long will we waint for new UI? For native GTK/QT interface or new layout like in Office? Another 10 years ?

If they want to implement an

Me (not verified) on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 13:39

If they want to implement an Office-like UI I hope we have to wait more and more than 10 years (100 would be perfect because I don't think I will live more than 130 years) so this will be a problem (a big problem) only for new generation guys and not for us :-).

Not waiting

Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 03:28

I really *don't* want a new layout like in Office. And I don't care about a native interface. Give me the features, make 'em easy to use. As long as it doesn't look butt-ugly, the rest can go hang.

But it does look butt ugly.

Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/25/2009 - 11:36

But it does look butt ugly.

Meh. I think I have

Poprocks (not verified) on Tue, 12/01/2009 - 11:21

Meh. I think I have different tastes than most people. To me, the pinnacle of the UI was Windows/Office 2000. OOo carries on that tradition by maintaining a traditional, powerful interface.

To me, Windows Vista, 7, and Office 2007 look like puke.

Most likely it will be in

Zayed on Fri, 10/23/2009 - 15:48

Most likely it will be in 2020 :)

Nice work

Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 21:39

I'm now using Oo for nearly all my daily documentation work, it works better than what I expected :-/

Thank you for this good news.

Hamad Al-Absi (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 17:53

Thank you for this good news.

Windows 64bit native version

Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 16:27

Windows 64bit native version (using java 64 bits)?

A couple of clarifications: -

RGB (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 14:57

A couple of clarifications:
- Beta 1 is out (320_m2)
- kde4 integration code is there, but you need to compile OOo yourself to use it because in the precompiled packages it is disable. See here: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104495
Right now, beta 1 under kde4 looks like the the win-doze version under wine... ;)
- otf support it is only partial: fonts can be used, printed and exported to pdf, but there is no automatic ligatures or other advanced otf characteristics.
- The good: many errors with metafile handling are fixed (more notable, problems with rotating metafiles), and the cross reference to headings and numbered paragraph introduced in 3.0 is now working perfectly.

Great News !! Now, what about compatibility ?

iveen Duarte (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 14:43

i was asked to submit a document in Word format, so I did it in Oo 3.1,saved it in Word 2003/XP format. Then I opened in a Windows Machine using Word, and the document was differene, it didn't have the titles, etc. Similar issues happen with Calc/Excel. What about some improvements in that department ?

features I don't see

Larry (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 14:12

I still don't see obvious fixes that should have been made a decade ago:

1. Ability to set a default font for new documents.

2. Ability to simply TURN OFF automatic numbering.

3. Will they ever fix multipage tile printing of large drawings?

(But thanks for the Alt-X shortcut keys, that will help)

1. and 2. are there since I

RGB (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 15:01

1. and 2. are there since I remember (and I'm using OOo since version 1.0). For the first one, you need to learn how to use templates. For the second, Tools -> Autocorrect -> Options.
That's all.
For 3. I don't know, never needed that feature.

Happy...

TenPlus1 (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 13:24

I'm glad that the new version of Oo is faster and more stable, as for features.. I use it every day and it works great for me from simple documents to high-end spreadsheets... Ms Office isnt the be-all and end-all of office apps, OpenOffice does a great job... Thanks guys...

Needs a better interface.

Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 13:22

When is the OpenOffice team going to improve their interface design looks?

They all look pretty bleak against all the other rivals e.g. - MS Office, AbiWord, SSuite Office etc.

They need to step up to get ahead of the competition.

Another 2 or 3 years of

Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 12:34

Another 2 or 3 years of development and OO will know almost as much as offie 2000.

In a future version, removing 5 chars password limit? Unbelivable...

Being able to open a readonly or new copy from a locked file? This was a feature of office 95, omg...

And grown up, sane people state oo has every feature ms office has, but more. It laks even fundamental features. It's ok to use it for a 2 page letter at home but nonsense for serious work.

AS said Troll

PeteN (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 22:24

obviously an MS freak used to MS failware nuff said

Troll!

Adam Tauno Williams (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 14:17

Nice Troll! To bad I maintain several 200+ page documents in OOo; their support for cross-reference and multi-part (ODM) documents is excellent; even indexes and tables-of-contents happily span multiple document parts.

You know not of what you speak.

Totally agree! I wrote my PhD

Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 01:19

Totally agree!
I wrote my PhD thesis with it. It's over 160 pages long, makes use of formatting style, table of content, tables and figures with captions, different page number styles, has many references, a bibligraphy, etc.

GTK!

d0od (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 08:07

A side effect of 3.2 using QT4 is, obviously, rather awesome GTK integration! ^_^

I'm glad it is improving...

Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 07:42

I'm curious if it has the ability to do dotted lined borders. I solved my problem long ago with OpenOffice not having it. I found another way to do it. I use OpenOffice extensively in my business and haven't really had any major complaints. Microsoft Office has gotten worse and worse. They started hiding things and now it is just ridicules. You need IT to come configure it so you can do basic word processing. The file menu is also a nightmare. Microsoft insistence on dumbing things down makes it harder for those who aren't that bright and annoying for those who are. It is the exact reverse of what is intended. MS Office still doesn't support PDF or Flash. I can't believe people put up with it. I stopped using it years ago- and now only assist other people in using it for major $$$$. I actually feel bad not telling people about OpenOffice... but the other half I do tell them. I can't imagine using MS Office on GNU/Linux and that is often when my clients first discover OpenOffice.

More easier grammar checkings

Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 04:24

More easier grammar checkings

Thanks. I fixed it !!

Fahad on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 11:03

Thanks. I fixed it !!

interesting post

Hanadi on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 23:10

When I read the title, I asked myself: can I use this version to open MS Word 2007 documents ?
and I found the answer.

interesting post :)
* Waiting for the next post

Squiggles

Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 22:46

If you export a presentation to html does it still export the spell check squiggles?

Would a grammar checker have caught that?

Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 22:41

Hope someday it becomes the most easiest.

More than 42 features?

Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 20:05

...so: *43* features?

Autoshapes, gradients and overall aesthetics

Tim (not verified) on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 20:03

One area that OOo really needs to address is autoshapes and gradients. Currently it is pretty hard to make a nice looking diagram using the autoshapes (which yes, is not what a word processor is for.. but that's what people use them for).

Finally - aesthetics. For me, a word processor is to write letters. It doesn't need to look good, just be functional. However for many aesthetics are crucial for some reason. So OOo needs to conform - or offer another version that does conform - in order to really take a bite out of Microsoft Office devotees.

Regardless, I'm an OOo fan and I will stay that way I'm sure. Can't wait for the next release.

It's missing...

Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 19:58

The two things that really would have allowed me to switch from MS Office while I was in college:

1. Grammar check.
2. A way to right click on a word and check a thesaurus.

And... I had a bad experience the one time I did try it out (about a year ago despite the two above shortcomings). My printer had ran out of ink, so I exported my document to a .pdf, so I could print it at a friends house. In converting to .pdf all of the punctuation became invisible. I didn't check before driving to his house. What a PITA that caused a very stressful situation.

Open Office has yet to regain my trust. Why not focus on making it actually usable (more user friendly) and stable rather than adding obscure features like password protection? Who uses that anyway? Can't you just put the file in a zip file and use a password for that? Or you know, utilize one of the many other ways of securing your file?

Grammar

VITRIOL (not verified) on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 10:29

Grammar checker:

http://www.languagetool.org/

Thanks it really helps.

Fahad on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 14:38

Thanks it really helps.

So, you didn't check a PDF...

Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 10/23/2009 - 21:37

and it's OO's fault that you're dumb?

And also, those are your two "killer" features? I feel dumber having read your post.

Grammar check

Jonadab (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 23:15

Grammar checking *sounds* like a good idea, unless you either A) know what the phrase "AI complete" means or B) have ever used word processing software that tried to do grammar checking.

The long and short of it is, you may *think* you want your word processing software to check your grammar, but you would most definitely NOT want software to check your grammar if you knew how terrible a job it would do. Computers aren't smart enough to check grammar, not even at a gradeschool level of proficiency, and *certainly* not at a college level.

Seriously?

Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 07:32

Seriously? Grammar check? Talk about obscure feature nobody uses. The MS grammar check doesn't even work.

Grammar checks... a real joke

Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 11:51

The most funny error I got from grammar check on MS Word was that there was a problem with my name and my surname... it told me there was a problem with verb and subject, that one was singular and the other was plural (both had initial in uppercase)

Relying on a grammar checking is a very bad idea... the spell-check may spot some typos but the grammar checks usually make too many false alerts and misses a lot of mistakes...

I agree it seems silly to do

Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 22:57

I agree it seems silly to do all these bizarre, rarely used features while glazing over the more obvious and user-usage oriented ones. But that is usually one of the problems with open source software.

nice but

Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 19:58

it's look very nice.
but honestly i prefer the microsoft one, at least he didn't crash every times like the open one.

OpenOffice crashes? I didn't

Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 07:35

OpenOffice crashes? I didn't know that. I use it all the time and can't recall one crash. Maybe you are on MS Windows or use some package that has bugs. It isn't my experience though. unless you meant the reverse. MS Office crashes too much. That I could see.

Crashes

Jonadab (not verified) on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 23:23

> OpenOffice crashes? I didn't know that.

It crashes more frequently on some computers than on others, and this seems to be true irrespective of operating system or OOo version. It's not as crashy overall as Inkscape, but yeah, it does happen.

Fortunately, recent versions generally are pretty successful at recovering your work, which is nice. The first versions that had the recovery feature frequently didn't quite manage it successfully, but these days it doesn't seem to have that problem, or at least I haven't seen it lately.

Now if only it would let us insert scalable images (SVG) into our word processing documents, and rotate frames and images to arbitrary angles...

I use both. Right now I have

Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 22:51

I use both.

Right now I have both scalc and excel open. Open Office has better compatibility and more features for spreadsheets. And I prefer the layout of Writer to the craptastic menus of Word.

O.O does everything Microsoft can do, and more. I continue to use Word and Excel at work because that's what everyone else uses, and it ensures compatibility. Plus you can't argue with the price.

Except they are still

Scot McPherson (not verified) on Fri, 10/23/2009 - 18:41

Except they are still incompatible with each. This is probably the single most important feature, and it fails to meet that expectation.

more easier?

Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 19:52

more easier? really?

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.